User talk:Readingwhatyousaid

20090202 Patch Comments
Hi Readingwhatyousaid, I've been going through your edits and I have few comments:
 * Can you please add links to original (rgtr.com/playtr.com) Patch notes/Updates to Update articles you create?
 * I don't think we need mark whole patch notes in italics. Old Patch notes articles haven't used this and I think your time would be much better spent if you would link missions/items/... to related wiki articles from Patch notes.
 * There is no bug with "Text edit bug found in TaRaPedia code where intented italics is the same as an embedded table." There is big difference between these two syntaxes (notice the double star instead of indented star):

! Wiki source code ! Result ! Usage * First Sub item * First Sub-sub item * First Sub item * First Sub-sub item Welcome to Tarapedia (I don't know, why the name is Tarapedia - I'm not an original admin) → Zarevak 16:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * - align="left"
 * First item
 * First Sub item
 * First Sub-sub item
 * Second item
 * First item
 * First Sub item
 * First Sub-sub item
 * Second item
 * multiple stars are used for sub items
 * - align="left"
 * First item
 * - align="left"
 * First item
 * First item
 * Second item
 * First item
 * First item
 * Second item
 * space as first character is used for displaying fixed width font output (source code, ...)
 * }
 * okay, I'll wrap up what I started here faster and see what mission stuff is still up. I saw a map yesterday I wanted to do.Readingwhatyousaid 05:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Patch notes are up to date.  Italics removed.  I noticed that a few links go to Europe NCsoft.  I first thought the company was from Texas.  Next I read on the Internet they are out of Korea.  Why are the more detailed patch notes coming from Europe?  More importantly, is this more so, the patch source? Readingwhatyousaid 09:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * IIRC it was just matter of preference. I'm from Europe so I've used Europe sources. Europe patch notes were a bit delayed after the US ones and were IMHO bit more nicer and in more standardized style then the US ones. Although the actual content should be the same.
 * Compare: D9.6 EU Patch Notes vs. D9.6 US Patch Notes (Highlights section vs. summary paragraph. More items in EU Known Issues section.)
 * → Zarevak 12:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)